Engineering decisions you can defend.

A modular decision intelligence platform. Domain-specific modules run on a shared architecture: structured workflows, assumption capture, standards alignment, and audit-ready reporting.

Open Dashboard

The cost of ad hoc decisions

Why engineering decisions fail

Critical decisions break down when context and rigor are scattered.

Fragmented tools.Fragmented tools — calculations live in spreadsheets, emails, and one-off scripts with no single system of record.
Assumption drift.Assumption drift — inputs and assumptions change over time with no ownership or validation cadence.
Lost context.Lost context — who decided what, on what basis, and when is not traceable.
Non-auditable calculations.Non-auditable calculations — results cannot be reproduced or defended in front of reviewers or regulators.
Static reports.Static reports disconnected from data — deliverables are snapshots that do not reflect current assumptions or evidence.

Architecture

Modular decision architecture

One platform. Structured workflows. Expandable modules.

Structured workflows that guide inputs, methods, and outputs so nothing is ad hoc.

Assumption capture and tracking so every decision documents what it relies on and who owns it.

Standards integration so methods and outputs align with recognized codes and practices.

AI-assisted document analysis where it adds value, without replacing engineering judgment.

Professional report generation (PDF, DOCX) suitable for clients and review boards.

Designed for expanding modules — new domain applications are added on the same foundation.

Decision systems

Decision Modules Available Now

Domain-specific decision systems built on the platform.

CPAlert — Pipeline integrity alerts and signal management.

Continuous monitoring of assumptions and signals that affect pipeline integrity decisions.
Drift detection and ownership so degrading or unowned assumptions are visible.
Audit-ready records for compliance and governance.

CPAlert

ExergySubsea — Campaign planning and execution for subsea operations.

Structured planning, vessel and resource optimization, and execution tracking.
Assumption and constraint capture for high-consequence subsea decisions.
Cost and schedule outputs tied to explicit inputs and methods.

ExergySubsea

IntegrityPL — Scenario intelligence and risk-based integrity decisions.

Scenario modeling and risk simulation with traceable inputs and assumptions.
Standards-aligned assessments and defensible recommendations.
Reporting suitable for asset teams and external review.

IntegrityPL

IntelliFFS — Fitness-for-service assessment (Level 3 FFS).

Structured FFS workflows for piping, pipelines, and pressure vessels with solver integration.
Assumption and geometry capture, FEA-driven evaluation, and API 579–aligned logic.
Audit-ready reports with methodology, inputs, and conclusions.

IntelliFFS

Supporting utilities

Free engineering toolkits

Available to registered users as supporting utilities.

Standards-aligned calculators and utilities across pipeline, mechanical, integrity, and related disciplines. They provide an entry point into the ecosystem and support day-to-day calculations—they are not the core product. Subscribe to modules for full decision-system capability.

Browse Toolkits

Pipeline · Mechanical · Integrity · Standards-aligned

For engineering teams

Built for professionals who need defensible, auditable outcomes.

Pipeline Engineers · Integrity Engineers · Subsea Engineers · Mechanical Engineers · Asset Teams · Engineering Consultants

Roadmap

A growing decision framework

New modules are under development. AssureAI is an expandable architecture: we add domain-specific decision systems on the same foundation so your organization can standardize how critical engineering decisions are made, documented, and defended.

Ready to Get Started?

Structured workflows. Assumption tracking. Standards alignment. Audit-ready reporting. Request a demo or explore the platform.

Open Dashboard

Engineering decisions you can defend.

A modular decision intelligence platform. Domain-specific modules run on a shared architecture: structured workflows, assumption capture, standards alignment, and audit-ready reporting.

Open Dashboard

The cost of ad hoc decisions

Why engineering decisions fail

Critical decisions break down when context and rigor are scattered.

Fragmented tools.Fragmented tools — calculations live in spreadsheets, emails, and one-off scripts with no single system of record.
Assumption drift.Assumption drift — inputs and assumptions change over time with no ownership or validation cadence.
Lost context.Lost context — who decided what, on what basis, and when is not traceable.
Non-auditable calculations.Non-auditable calculations — results cannot be reproduced or defended in front of reviewers or regulators.
Static reports.Static reports disconnected from data — deliverables are snapshots that do not reflect current assumptions or evidence.

Architecture

Modular decision architecture

One platform. Structured workflows. Expandable modules.

Structured workflows that guide inputs, methods, and outputs so nothing is ad hoc.

Assumption capture and tracking so every decision documents what it relies on and who owns it.

Standards integration so methods and outputs align with recognized codes and practices.

AI-assisted document analysis where it adds value, without replacing engineering judgment.

Professional report generation (PDF, DOCX) suitable for clients and review boards.

Designed for expanding modules — new domain applications are added on the same foundation.

Decision systems

Decision Modules Available Now

Domain-specific decision systems built on the platform.

CPAlert — Pipeline integrity alerts and signal management.

Continuous monitoring of assumptions and signals that affect pipeline integrity decisions.
Drift detection and ownership so degrading or unowned assumptions are visible.
Audit-ready records for compliance and governance.

CPAlert

ExergySubsea — Campaign planning and execution for subsea operations.

Structured planning, vessel and resource optimization, and execution tracking.
Assumption and constraint capture for high-consequence subsea decisions.
Cost and schedule outputs tied to explicit inputs and methods.

ExergySubsea

IntegrityPL — Scenario intelligence and risk-based integrity decisions.

Scenario modeling and risk simulation with traceable inputs and assumptions.
Standards-aligned assessments and defensible recommendations.
Reporting suitable for asset teams and external review.

IntegrityPL

IntelliFFS — Fitness-for-service assessment (Level 3 FFS).

Structured FFS workflows for piping, pipelines, and pressure vessels with solver integration.
Assumption and geometry capture, FEA-driven evaluation, and API 579–aligned logic.
Audit-ready reports with methodology, inputs, and conclusions.

IntelliFFS

Supporting utilities

Free engineering toolkits

Available to registered users as supporting utilities.

Browse Toolkits

Pipeline · Mechanical · Integrity · Standards-aligned

For engineering teams

Built for professionals who need defensible, auditable outcomes.

Pipeline Engineers · Integrity Engineers · Subsea Engineers · Mechanical Engineers · Asset Teams · Engineering Consultants

Roadmap

A growing decision framework

Ready to Get Started?

Structured workflows. Assumption tracking. Standards alignment. Audit-ready reporting. Request a demo or explore the platform.

Open Dashboard